Track movement you can actually verify.
Follow commitments, answered questions, named triggers, response times, and reviewed themes without inventing a community-confidence score.
Request a demoResolve hearing questions before Oct 18
Track only the evidence and commitments that can change this decision.
Coverage boundary: public sources and two reviewed field channels. Silence is not counted as support.
Connect the intelligence effort to the outcome the team is trying to move.
Operational goals
Define the decision, milestone, or open question that makes a signal worth watching.
Named triggers
Watch for specific events such as filings, hearings, commitments, or a material narrative change.
Coverage made visible
Show which sources and communities were observed so silence is never presented as support.
A clear path from context to action.
- 01Set a measurable objective→
- 02Name the triggers→
- 03Review movement and gaps→
Useful enough to act on. Honest enough to challenge.
Evidence and interpretation stay separate. A contributor can record a hunch without turning it into a fact.
Uncertainty is a first-class field. Gaps, contradictions, and stale relationships stay visible in the decision view.
Every recommendation has a boundary. The team can see what supports the move and what still needs validation.
Test Objectives & Watchlists on one live project.
Define the decision, the source coverage, and the next 30 days of work before expanding scope.